Vidal vs Grandest trick

Du hast Fragen zu Regeln oder Karten? Stell sie hier!
User avatar
Mateusz
Justicar
Justicar
Posts: 1260
Joined: 30 Dec 2003, 13:41
Location: Bonn
VEKN Nr.:
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 76 times
Contact:

Re: Vidal vs Grandest trick

Post by Mateusz »

Ok, habs in vekn.net gepostet und die Antwort, wenn ich sie richtig interpretiere gibt mir recht, es funktioniert.


Image
User avatar
Männele
Vorsintflutlicher
Vorsintflutlicher
Posts: 5479
Joined: 19 Feb 2003, 11:44
Location: Frankfurt am Main
VEKN Nr.: 1000565
Has thanked: 626 times
Been thanked: 127 times
Contact:

Re: Vidal vs Grandest trick

Post by Männele »

Ich verstehe ihn auch so wie du. Daher hast du recht gehabt. Er kann laut Pascal mit TGT sogar action modifier spielen, die einen Clan benötigen. Das ist ja das ähnliche Problem und ich hätte ebenfalls argumentiert, dass ein Clan einen Vampir voraussetzt. Wieder schlauer geworden.
Ich habe noch nie etwas vergessen. Das wüsste ich.
User avatar
Murat
Justicar
Justicar
Posts: 1217
Joined: 23 Feb 2005, 08:31
Location: Bochum
VEKN Nr.:
Contact:

Re: Vidal vs Grandest trick

Post by Murat »

Könnt ihr seine Antwort mal hier einstellen?
Hab bei Weightwatcher angerufen, hat aber keiner abgenommen.
User avatar
cmdrKEEN
Archont
Archont
Posts: 606
Joined: 10 Mar 2010, 02:47
Location: Darmstadt
VEKN Nr.: 3620007
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 116 times
Contact:

Re: Vidal vs Grandest trick

Post by cmdrKEEN »

Murat wrote:Könnt ihr seine Antwort mal hier einstellen?
gerne
Pascal Bertrand wrote:Re: Vidal vs. The grandest trick!?
#20856
Mateusz wrote:
Hi folks

We had a rules discussion on the german vekn forum about the following point:

Can Vidal jarbeuax recruit a harzomatuili (requiring an Archbishop or Cardinal) when using the grandest Trick? In other words: Is the trait "requires Archbishop" equal to "requires a vampire".

"Not for his special" (similarly, for his special, "requiring a baron" is different from "requiring an anarch"). [LSJ 20081124]
floppyzedolfin wrote:
> 5/ Now, the stupid one : Is " vampire" a non-infernal vampire trait ?

No.

> So, now, the stupid example : Vidal uses his cardtext to play The
> Grandest Trick, the action being, say, a bleed. His special cardtext
> still applies : Vidal (the ally) can meet the clan, sect, or non-
> infernal vampire trait requirements to play a card.
> He plays a !Nosferatu-requiring (Gang Tactics, for instance) card. If
> the answer to the question 5/ (the stupid one) is "yes", Vidal faking
> to be a vampire when he fakes to be an ally cannot play a !Ventrue-
> requiring (Innocent Bystander, for instance) card any more.

You lost me.

He can bleed and play Grandest Trick and then Gang Tactics. (Or the other way
'round).
If the bleed is successful, then he can play Innocent Bystander.
und hier ist der Link dahin
VEKN Nr.: 3620007
User avatar
the scavenger
Justicar
Justicar
Posts: 1218
Joined: 08 Aug 2003, 12:46
VEKN Nr.:
Contact:

Re: Vidal vs Grandest trick

Post by the scavenger »

Mateusz wrote:Ok, habs in vekn.net gepostet und die Antwort, wenn ich sie richtig interpretiere gibt mir recht, es funktioniert.
Wenn ich das richtig interpretiert habe, hat Pascal die entscheidende Frage (geht Grandest Trick auf eine Karte, die Archbishop required) nicht beantwortet. Aber LSJ mal:
LSJ wrote:
> 2. The Grandest Trick states: Only usable on an ation that doesn't cost
> blood or require a vampire, clan or Discipline. Can the action be one that
> requires a non- clan specific title, such as Eternal Vigilance or War Party?
> Does the vampire lose his/ her titles during the action?

No.
Yes.
--
LSJ (vtes...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
sk.
"We will do better to expect that life will not provide the answers we need so much as it will offer the privilege of improving our questions." (Norman Mailer)
User avatar
Männele
Vorsintflutlicher
Vorsintflutlicher
Posts: 5479
Joined: 19 Feb 2003, 11:44
Location: Frankfurt am Main
VEKN Nr.: 1000565
Has thanked: 626 times
Been thanked: 127 times
Contact:

Re: Vidal vs Grandest trick

Post by Männele »

Okay, das Zitat von fleshcrafter gibt den Zweiflern recht. Ich poste das nochmal an Pascal auf vekn.net. Wir werden die Klärung doch noch schaffen?
Ich habe noch nie etwas vergessen. Das wüsste ich.
cutie
Archont
Archont
Posts: 784
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 11:27
Location: Gelsenkirchen
VEKN Nr.:
Contact:

Re: Vidal vs Grandest trick

Post by cutie »

Pascal Bertrand:

Sorry for the confusion.
Vidal cannot play The Grandest Trick on a Harzomatuili action (TGT's cardtext and the ruling you provided).

http://vekn.net/index.php/forum/6-rules ... rick#20937
A lesson lived is a lesson learned.
User avatar
Pyro
Archont
Archont
Posts: 801
Joined: 29 Aug 2005, 12:12
Location: Stuttgart
VEKN Nr.:
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Vidal vs Grandest trick

Post by Pyro »

Halleluja! 8)
I...ehm...forgot the edge.........again......

VEKN ID: 1005861
Post Reply